Architectural risk and workplace safety: proposal for an assessment method

  • Erminia Attaianese Dipartimento di Architettura, Università di Napoli Federico II
  • Raffaele D’Angelo CONTARP-INAIL, Direzione Regionale Campania
  • Gabriella Duca Dipartimento di Architettura, Università di Napoli Federico II
Keywords: Comfort, wellbeing, workers, risk indicators, assessment protocol


The paper discusses a study on assessment of workplace risks related to characteristics of buildings where work activities are hosted. Despite architectural risk is mentioned in work safety Italian regulations, technical and regulation everyday practices demonstrate a poor consideration of this concept, that is applied to a limited number of built environment aspects. On the other side, many evidences exist about the relation between occupants’ injuries or diseases and technical and environmental characteristics of life and work environments. From this background, the presented study has considered comfort and occupants’ safety as Key Performance Areas for architectural risk controlling; KPAs have been detailed in architectural requirements for technical and environmental aspects of buildings. Then, for each requirement, specific a set of risk indicators has been defined and arranged in forms to be used for the assessment of the building in its whole as well as for each single room or space. The suite of forms is the protocol for architectural risk assessment, that has been validated in a pharmaceutical manufacturing plant.


Afacan, Y., Erbug, C., 2009. An interdisciplinary heuristic evaluation method for universal building design. Applied Ergonomics 40 (4), 731 - 744.

Attaianese, E., Attaianese, L., Coppola, N., D’Angelo, R., De Margheriti, G., Duca, G., Russo, E., 2009. Limiti normativi e potenzialità delle prassi nella valutazione del rischio architettonico sui luoghi di lavoro. Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia XXXI, 299 - 300.

Attaianese, E., Attaianese, L., Coppola, N., D’Angelo, R., De Margheriti, G., Duca, G., Russo, E. 2011. Il ruolo delle condizioni architettoniche ed ergonomiche nella valutazione integrata del rischio da polveri farmaceutiche. Un caso studio: il progetto IntegrARE. Atti dei 3° Incontri Mediterranei di Igiene Industriale. Napoli, 6 - 7 ottobre, 179 - 187.

Attaianese, E., Duca, G., 2012. Human factors and ergonomic principles in building design for life and work activities: an applied methodology. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 13 (2), 187 - 202.

Baglioni, A., 2006. Sicurezza negli ambienti di vita. Manuale di progettazione edilizia - Vol. 3, Progetto tecnico e qualità , Hoepli, Milano, 80 - 91.

Chappells, H., 2010. Comfort, well-being and the sociotechnical dynamics of everyday life. Intelligent Buildings International, 2 (4), 286 - 298.

Decreto Interministeriale del 30 novembre 2012. Procedure standardizzate per la valutazione dei rischi ai sensi dell’art. 29 D.Lgs. 81/2008. Ministeri del lavoro e delle politiche sociali, Ministero della salute, Ministero dell’interno, Roma.

Decreto Legislativo 9 aprile 2008, n. 81. Testo Unico sulla sicurezza e salute sul lavoro.

Decreto del Presidente della Repubblica n. 380 del 6 giugno 2001. Testo Unico delle disposizioni legislative e regolamentari in materia edilizia (Testo A).

Hamilton, D.K., Watkins, D.H., 2008. Evidence-based Design for Multiple Building Types. John Wiley & Sons, NY.

Henry Dreifuss Associates, 2002. The measure of man and woman - Human factors in design. John Wiley & Sons, NY.

ISO 11064:1, Ergonomic design of control centres - Principles for the design of control centres, International Standard Organization, Geneva, 2000.

ISO 1681:3, Building environment design - Indoor environment - General principles, International Standard Organization, Geneva, 2006.

ISO 6385, Ergonomic principles in the design of work systems, International Standard Organization, Geneva, 2004.

ISO 7730, Ergonomics of the thermal environment - Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria, International Standard Organization, Geneva, 2005.

Mahdavi, A., Unzeitig, U., 2005. Occupancy implications of spatial, indoor-environmental, and organizational features of office spaces. Building and Environment, 40 (1), 113 - 123.

Maier, J.R.A., Fadel, G.M., Battisto, D.G., 2009. An affordance-based approach to architectural theory, design, and practice. Design Studies, 30 (4), 393 - 414.

Pati, D., Park, C.S. and Augenbroe, G., 2006. Roles of building performance assessment in stakeholder dialogue. Automation in construction, 15 (4), 415 - 427.

Regolamento UE N. 305/2011 del Parlamento Europeo e Del Consiglio del 9 Marzo 2011, L 88/5. G.U. dell’Unione europea, 4/4/2011.

Schulte, P.A., Rinehart, R., Okun, A., Geraci, C.L., Heidel, D.S., 2008. National Prevention through Design (PtD) Initiative. Journal of Safety Research, 39 (2), 115 - 121.

UNI 8290, Edilizia Residenziale. Sistema tecnologico. Classificazione e terminologia, Ente Italiano Unificazione, Milano, 1981.

UNI 10530, Principi di ergonomia della visione - sistemi di lavoro ed illuminazione, Ente Italiano Unificazione, Milano, 1997.

UNI EN ISO 9001, Sistemi di gestione per la qualità - Requisiti, Ente Italiano Unificazione, Milano, 2008.

UNI EN ISO 9004, Sistemi di gestione per la qualità - Linee guida per il miglioramento delle prestazioni, Milano, 2000.

WHO, 1948. Definition of Health. World Health Organization, New York.

WHO, 2011. Environmental burden of disease associated with inadeguate housing (EDB). World Health Organization, New York.